Drawing for LATTICE INCORPORATED

USPTO serial 77109077

LATTICE INCORPORATED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LATTICE INCORPORATED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric S. Marzluf

ERIC S. MARZULUF CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEIN, COHEN, ET AL.1635 MARKET STREET, 11TH FLOORSEVEN PENN CENTERPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF SELECTION, IMPLEMENTATION AND USE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS; DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERSACTIVEFeb 5, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 6, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 6, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 23, 2011EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 27, 2010RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Oct 6, 2010GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2010GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 12, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 19, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 28, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 28, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 27, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 27, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 4, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 4, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 4, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 4, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance