USPTO serial 77109143
ADVANCED REAL-TIME ADAPTIVE RADIOTHERAPY (ART)2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADVANCED REAL-TIME ADAPTIVE RADIOTHERAPY (ART)2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edmonton, CA
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
EDMONTON, ALBERTA, CA
EDMONTON, ALBERTA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel D. Chapman
Daniel D. Chapman Jackson Walker LLP112 East Pecan Street2400 FloorSan Antonio, TX 78205Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical device, namely, a linear accelerator magnetic resonator (a linac-MR hybrid) | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | information materials, namely, posters, brochures, pamphlets, information sheets, booklets, articles in newsletters, magazines, newspapers, journals and other periodicals, as well as educational information materials handed out at seminars, presentations, conferences, displays, expositions and exhibits all relating to cancer and any other disease sites requiring radiation as a treatment | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | medical services in the field of cancer treatment and diagnosis, namely, diagnostic procedures, treatment strategies, treatment therapies and treatment verification, to assist in the diagnosis, assessment of progression, and treatment of cancer, diagnosis, assessment of progression and treatment of cancer, advanced cancer treatment strategies, namely, planning verification, tracking, radiation delivery and dose monitoring, monitoring of treatment progression, optimizing and delivering cancer radiation treatments and radiation treatments for any other disease sites requiring radiation; Medical imaging services, namely, soft-tissue imaging of the tumor and healthy tissue to allow planning and delivery of precise dose distribution to target the tumor and avoid healthy tissue, tracking of moving exquisitely visualized anatomy during normal respiration to allow intensity-modulated ionizing radiation to irradiate to the moving tumor target and avoid healthy tissue, four dimensional reconstruction and monitoring of dose delivery and planning, verification, optimization and delivery of prescribed dose distribution utilizing embedded computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alberta Cancer Board
- Other trademarks owned by Alberta Cancer Board
- Other trademarks owned by ALBERTA HEALTH SERVICES
- Other trademarks owned by ALBERTA HEALTH SERVICES
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ADVANCED REAL-TIME ADAPTIVE RADIOTHERAPY (ART)2
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2011 | 44EM | 44(e) PETITION - DISMISSED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | 44EP | 44(e) PETITION - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2009 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 26, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |