Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77109823?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77109823. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns BITCH ELEGANCE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77109823, the listed owner(s) include: DJB HOLDING, LLC, Bennett, Dawn J., Bennett, Dawn J..

What is USPTO serial number 77109823?

Serial number 77109823 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark BITCH ELEGANCE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of BITCH ELEGANCE?

BITCH ELEGANCE (77109823) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover BITCH ELEGANCE?

The public record lists International Classes: 009. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77109823

BITCH ELEGANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: Feb 16, 2007
Status date: Jun 21, 2010
Registration date: —
Examiner: SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BITCH ELEGANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

DJB HOLDING, LLC
Washington, DC
Other trademarks owned by DJB HOLDING, LLC
Bennett, Dawn J.
Chevy Chase, MD
Other trademarks owned by Bennett, Dawn J.
Bennett, Dawn J.
Chevy Chase, MD
Other trademarks owned by Bennett, Dawn J.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen Pruess

Stuart Rogers1400 K Street NW, Suite 501Washington, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	Protective helmets, safety helmets, and sports helmets, goggles for protection, safety, and sports that convert to sunglasses	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Feb 7, 2012	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Feb 7, 2012	COAR	TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED	—
Jun 21, 2010	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2010	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 24, 2010	ASGN	AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP	—
Jan 11, 2010	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2010	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Nov 17, 2009	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 25, 2009	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 2009	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Jul 17, 2009	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Jul 17, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 17, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 16, 2009	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jul 15, 2009	PARI	TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED	—
Jul 15, 2009	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Jul 15, 2009	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jul 15, 2009	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jul 10, 2008	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jul 10, 2008	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jul 10, 2008	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jun 13, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 13, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 12, 2008	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jun 11, 2008	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Jun 11, 2008	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jun 11, 2008	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jun 11, 2008	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Dec 11, 2007	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Dec 11, 2007	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Nov 14, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 14, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2007	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2007	ZZZX	PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN	—
May 14, 2007	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
May 11, 2007	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Feb 22, 2007	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—