USPTO serial 77109845
IPREP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IPREP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lorraine Linford
LORRAINE LINFORD SEED IP LAW GROUP PLLC701 5TH AVESUITE 5400SEATTLE, WA 98104-7064Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical, biochemical and biotechnological preparations for scientific and industrial purposes; diagnostic preparations, other than for medical or veterinary purposes; reagents and solvents for sample preparation, the modification and manipulation of cells, and for conducting marking, separating, isolating, purifying, duplicating and analysis methods for biopolymers, namely, nucleic acids, proteins, macromolecules and biologically active substances; kits comprised primarily of chemicals for industrial or scientific use for sample preparation, the modification and manipulation of cells, and for the marking, separating, isolating, purifying, duplicating and analysis of biopolymers, namely, nucleic acids, macromolecules, proteins and biologically active substances, namely, nucleic acids of biological and biochemical sample material | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | medical and veterinary preparations, namely, diagnostic preparations for sample preparation, the modification and manipulation of cells, and for conducting marking, separating, isolating, purifying, duplicating and analysis of biopolymers, namely, nucleic acids, proteins, macromolecules and biologically active substances; chemical, biochemical and biotechnological preparations for medical and veterinary use, namely, reagents and solvents for sample preparation, the modification and manipulation of cells, and for conducting marking, separating, isolating, purifying, duplicating and analysis methods for biopolymers, namely, nucleic acids, proteins, macromolecules and biologically active substances for diagnostic purposes; kits comprised primarily of medical and veterinary diagnostic preparations for sample preparation, the modification and manipulation of cells, and for conducting marking, separating, isolating, purifying, duplicating and analysis of biopolymers, namely, nucleic acids, proteins, macromolecules and biologically active substances, namely, nucleic acids of biological and biochemical sample material | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Scientific apparatus, instruments and equipment for research and experimentation purposes, and laboratory apparatus, measuring apparatus and instruments, for use with medical and veterinary diagnostic preparations for sample preparation, the modification and manipulation of cells, and for the marking, separating, isolating, cleaning, duplicating and analysis of biopolymers, namely, nucleic acids, proteins, macromolecules and biologically active substances, namely, nucleic acids from biological or biochemical sample material | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by QIAGEN GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by QIAGEN GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named IPREP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |