CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for JAVA MONSTER BIG BLACK

USPTO serial 77109898

JAVA MONSTER BIG BLACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LATTUCA, FRANK J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JAVA MONSTER BIG BLACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diane M. Reed

STEVEN J NATAUPSKY KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN STREET 14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutritional supplements in liquid and non-liquid form, but excluding perishable beverage products that contain fruit juice or soy, whether such products are pasteurized or notACTIVE—
032non-carbonated energy or sports drinks; excluding perishable beverages containing fruit juice or soy, whether such products are pasteurized or notACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 17, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 9, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 9, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 7, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 7, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 21, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 17, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance