Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77109919?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77109919. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns CLASSIC CHASE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77109919, the listed owner(s) include: DJB HOLDING, LLC, Bennett, Dawn J., Bennett, Dawn J..

What is USPTO serial number 77109919?

Serial number 77109919 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark CLASSIC CHASE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover CLASSIC CHASE?

The public record lists International Classes: 028. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77109919

CLASSIC CHASE

Q: What is the current status of CLASSIC CHASE?

CLASSIC CHASE (77109919) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: Feb 16, 2007
Status date: Oct 7, 2010
Registration date: —
Examiner: LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLASSIC CHASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

DJB HOLDING, LLC
Washington, DC
Other trademarks owned by DJB HOLDING, LLC
Bennett, Dawn J.
Chevy Chase, MD
Other trademarks owned by Bennett, Dawn J.
Bennett, Dawn J.
Chevy Chase, MD
Other trademarks owned by Bennett, Dawn J.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen Pruess

Stuart Rogers1400 K Stree NW, Suite 501Washington, NY 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
028	Toys and playthings, namely, dolls, board games, action figures, doll clothing, inflatable toys, jigsaw puzzles, card games, kites, party games, toy vehicles, toy banks, playing cards, plush toys, Christmas stockings, Christmas tree decorations, magic tricks, musical toys, balloons, bath tub toys, ride-on toy, flying discs, infant toys and accessories	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Feb 7, 2012	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Feb 7, 2012	COAR	TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED	—
Jan 3, 2011	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2011	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2010	INCE	ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST	—
Oct 19, 2010	AITU	CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL	—
Oct 1, 2010	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2010	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2010	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Apr 6, 2010	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 24, 2010	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Jan 12, 2010	NPUB	OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED	—
Jan 12, 2010	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 4, 2009	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Dec 3, 2009	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Dec 2, 2009	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Dec 1, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Dec 1, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 30, 2009	PARI	TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED	—
Jul 30, 2008	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jul 30, 2008	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jul 30, 2008	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jul 8, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 8, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 8, 2008	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jul 7, 2008	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Jul 7, 2008	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jul 7, 2008	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jul 7, 2008	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jan 4, 2008	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Jan 4, 2008	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 4, 2008	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Dec 6, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 6, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2007	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2007	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Feb 22, 2007	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—