Drawing for THE PLAZA

USPTO serial 77111321

THE PLAZA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BESCH, JAY C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PLAZA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel I. Schloss

Alan N. Sutin Greenberg Traurig, LLP200 Park Avenue34th FloorNew York, NY 10166

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online retail store services featuring clothing and souvenirs, rendered in connection with and relating to a luxury resort hotel property identified by Applicant's markACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 20, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 15, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 10, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 9, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 15, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 14, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 13, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 6, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 8, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 8, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 10, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 8, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 8, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 15, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 30, 2009TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Oct 30, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 30, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Dec 24, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 22, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 16, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 3, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 24, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 1, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 1, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 1, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 30, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 28, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 27, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance