USPTO serial 77111718
LEARNINGHORIZONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEARNINGHORIZONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Meister
ROBERT A. MEISTER PEDOWITZ & MEISTER LLP1501 BROADWAY STE 800NEW YORK, NY 10036-5505UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Providing downloadable electronic newsletters in the field of corporate learning organizations | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Newsletters in the field of corporate learning organizations | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Arranging and conducting business conferences; Providing a website featuring product ratings of the consumer goods and services of others in the field of corporate learning organizations | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Arranging and conducting educational conferences; Arranging of exhibitions, seminars and conferences; Arranging of seminars and conferences; Education in the field of corporate learning organizations rendered through video conference; Educational services, namely, conducting conferences in the field of corporate learning organizations and distribution of course material in connection therewith; Educational services, namely, developing, arranging, and conducting educational conferences and programs and providing courses of instruction in the field of corporate learning organizations; Educational services,namely, conducting conferences in the field of corporate learning organizations; Providing newsletters in the field of corporate learning organizations via e-mail | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jeanne C. Meister
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LEARNINGHORIZONS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |