Drawing for DUOTEMP

USPTO serial 77111818

DUOTEMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUOTEMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Everett E. Fruehling

EVERETT E. FRUEHLING CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON, ET AL.1420 5TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Animal and pet supplies and accessories, namely, heated and cooled pet food bowls and water dishesACTIVE—
019Animal and pet supplies and accessories, namely, pre-fabricated heated and cooled pet houses for dogs, cats, and other mammalsACTIVE—
020Animal and pet supplies and accessories, namely, heated and cooled pet cushions, heated and cooled pet beds, heated and cooled pet carriers and crates, heated and/or cooled fitted fabric sofa and chair pet protective covers to prevent damage and soilingACTIVE—
024Unfitted heated and/or cooled fabric human bed protective covers to prevent damage and soilingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 18, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 11, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 8, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 4, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 22, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 5, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance