USPTO serial 77111825
SOLARBLOC FIRE FOIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 26, 2009
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SOLARBLOC FIRE FOIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bradmill Outdoor Fabrics Pty. Ltd.
Derrimut, Victoria, AU
Other trademarks owned by Bradmill Outdoor Fabrics Pty. Ltd.
Bradmill Outdoor Fabrics Pty. Ltd.
Derrimut, Victoria, AU
Other trademarks owned by Bradmill Outdoor Fabrics Pty. Ltd.
Bradmill Outdoor Fabrics Pty. Ltd.
Derrimut, Victoria, AU
Other trademarks owned by Bradmill Outdoor Fabrics Pty. Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Bruce Prout
D. Bruce Prout CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPPO BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | FIRE RETARDANT TEXTILES, NAMELY, POLYCOTTON CANVAS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 17, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bradmill Outdoor Fabrics Pty. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Bradmill Outdoor Fabrics Pty. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Bradmill Outdoor Fabrics Pty. Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named SOLARBLOC FIRE FOIL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 26, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |