USPTO serial 77112468
STEYR ARMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURNS, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STEYR ARMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Wiener Neustadt, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory P. LaPointe
GREGORY P. LAPOINTE BACHMAN & LAPOINTE, P.C.900 CHAPEL ST STE 1201NEW HAVEN, CT 06510-2889UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand-operated apparatus and instruments; cutlery; sidearms, batons and thrustings | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Laser sighting apparatus; telescopic sights; night vision apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | Firearms; precision, target, sniper and assault guns; semi-automatic and fully-automatic guns; rifles and shotguns; pistols and revolvers; grenade launchers; parts of all aforementioned goods; accessories for all aforementioned goods, namely, stands and tripods, ammunition cartridges, silencers, aiming and sighting devices; ammunition and projectiles; explosives; holsters and ammunition belts | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Carrying cases and bags for arms, arms accessories, ammunition and projectiles; army, marksmen and hunting bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CURA Investholding GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named STEYR ARMS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |