USPTO serial 77113162
BT BODYTONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BT BODYTONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arturo Perez-Guerrero
ARTURO PEREZ-GUERRERO LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO PEREZ-GUERREROP.O.BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | BLADDERS OF BALLS FOR GAMES; RING GAMES; ARCHERY IMPLEMENTS OF JAPANESE AND WESTERN STYLES; BOWS FOR ARCHERY; FENCING WEAPONS, NAMELY, FOILS; HARNESS FOR WIND-SURFING; SPEARFISHING HARPOON GUNS; PLAY BALLOONS; BILLIARD GAME PLAYING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, BILLIARD TABLE CUSHIONS; TWIRLING BATONS; BATTING GLOVES; BASEBALL GLOVES; BILLIARD BALLS; BILLIARD MARKERS; BILLIARD TABLES; BILLIARD CUES; BILLIARD CUE TIPS; CHALK FOR BILLIARD CUES; FIREARM TARGETS; BOB-SLEIGHS; BODY BOARDS; BALLS FOR GAMES; SKITTLES; GOLF BAGS WITH OR WITHOUT WHEELS; BOXING GLOVES; CLIMBERS' HARNESS; ELBOW PADS FOR ATHLETIC USE; SURFBOARD LEASHES; CRICKET BAGS; FENCING GLOVES; FENCING MASKS; SHIN PADS FOR ATHLETIC USE; SKIS; EDGES OF SKIS; SKI BINDINGS; WATER SKIS; SURF SKIS; SCRAPERS FOR SKIS; COVERINGS FOR SKIS; BAGS AND COVERS FOR SURFBOARDS AND SURF SKIS; TABLES FOR TABLE FOOTBALL; GOLF GLOVES; PROTECTIVE PADDING FOR USE IN VOLLEYBALL, BASKETBALL, TENNIS, FOOTBALL AND BASEBALL; BALLS FOR GAMES; AUTOMATIC GAME MACHINES, NAMELY, STAND ALONE VIDEO GAME MACHINES; AUTOMATIC GAMES, NAMELY, HORIZONTAL PINBALL MACHINES, OTHER THAN COIN-OPERATED AND THOSE ADAPTED FOR USE WITH TELEVISION RECEIVERS ONLY; TABLES FOR TABLE TENNIS; SKATEBOARDS; GOLF CLUBS; HOCKEY STICKS; SKATING BOOTS WITH SKATES ATTACHED; IN-LINE SKATES; ICE SKATES; ROLLER SKATES; TOY SCOOTERS; PUNCHING-BALLS; TENNIS AND SQUASH RACKETS; STRINGS FOR TENNIS RACKETS; SNOWSHOES; NETS FOR SPORTS; NON-SLIP RESIN SPRAYS USED BY ATHLETES; KNEE GUARDS FOR ATHLETIC USE; ROULETTE TURNTABLES; TENNIS NETS; SLING SHOTS; SPRING BOARDS IN THE NATURE OF SPORTING ARTICLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |