USPTO serial 77113390
BECAUSE IT MATTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3873705Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 9, 2010
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BECAUSE IT MATTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INVESTMENTS LLC
WILMINGTON, DE
Quest Diagnostics Investments Incorporated
Wilmington, DE
Other trademarks owned by Quest Diagnostics Investments Incorporated
Quest Diagnostics Investments Incorporated
Wilmington, DE
Other trademarks owned by Quest Diagnostics Investments Incorporated
Quest Diagnostics Investments Incorporated
Wilmington, DE
Other trademarks owned by Quest Diagnostics Investments Incorporated
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Davis
DAVID J. DAVIS BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP300 E. Randolph StreetSuite 5000Chicago, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Providing information regarding hospital records; providing information regarding diagnostic tests, diagnostic testing results, diagnostic testing, diagnostic testing results; consulting services in the field of medical and diagnostic clinics and laboratories | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 26, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INVESTMENTS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Quest Diagnostics Investments Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Quest Diagnostics Investments Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Quest Diagnostics Investments Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named BECAUSE IT MATTERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 8, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2010 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 20, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |