USPTO serial 77113738
EZ BACKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EZ BACKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Fairfield, OH
Fairfield, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. Stallard
DAVID S. STALLARD WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP441 VINE STREET 2700 CAREW TOWERCINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Plastic composite material, namely, cement-coated, fiberglass mesh reinforced, polystyrene board for use in building construction | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 4, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 4, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |