USPTO serial 77113856
SAMPLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAMPLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Miami Shores, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry Oliver Chase
BARRY OLIVER CHASE LAW OFFICE OF BARRY OLIVER CHASE, P. A.21 SE 1ST AVE STE 700MIAMI, FL 33131-1025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Ceramic sculptures, vases, vessels, bowls, plates and pots; Decorative plates; Dinnerware, namely, plates and glasses for individual servings; Dishes; Dishes and plates; Glass bowls; Glass dishes; Plates; Plates for hors d'oeuvre; Serving bowls (hachi); Serving dishes; Serving forks; Serving ladles; Serving platters; Serving platters not of precious metal; Serving spoons; Serving tongs; Serving trays; Serving trays not of precious metal; Servingware for serving food; Shot glasses | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |