USPTO serial 77114115
VEGG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VEGG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Cayman, KY
Grand Cayman, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew H. Simpson
ANDREW H. SIMPSON KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-7216UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Massage apparatus, appliances and instruments, namely, massage apparatus for household use, massage apparatus for medical purpose, handheld massage apparatus for body or foot; electrically operated massagers, namely, electric massage apparatus for household use, electric massage apparatus for medical purpose, electric handheld massage apparatus for body or foot, electric foot massagers, electric vibrating massager; vibration generating apparatus for massage, namely, handheld vibrating massage apparatus for body or foot, electric vibrating massager; electrically operated massagers with computer programming function, namely, electric handheld massage apparatus for body or foot, electric vibrating massager; electrically operated massagers with a scale of rotation and vibration intensity adjustable by different musical signals, namely, electric handheld massage apparatus for body or foot, electric foot massagers, electric vibrating massager | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2008 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |