Drawing for MAXCLEAVAGE

USPTO serial 77114206

MAXCLEAVAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAAFAR, SAMIR MICHAEL
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAXCLEAVAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Adhesive bras; Bikinis; Bras; Briefs; Briefs; Disposable underwear; Fitted swimming costumes with bra cups; Knitted underwear; Ladies' underwear; Lingerie; Maternity lingerie; Panties, shorts and briefs; Parts of clothing, namely, gussets for tights, gussets for stockings, gussets for bathing suits, gussets for underwear, gussets for leotards and gussets for footlets; Perspiration absorbent underwear clothing; Shapewear, namely, bras, girdles; Sports bra; Strapless bras; Straps for bras; Swim wear; Swim wear for gentlemen and ladies; Swimming costumes; Swimming trunks; Tankinis; Thermal underwear; Thongs; Thongs; Underwear; Women's underwear; Woven or knitted underwear;Lingerie accessories, namely, removable silicone breast enhancer pads used in a braACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2017PR.DPETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED—
Nov 27, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 1, 2017PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2017TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 23, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 20, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 20, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 18, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 14, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 10, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 10, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 7, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 7, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 7, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 26, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 26, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Feb 28, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance