Drawing for WHITENING FUSION

USPTO serial 77114292

WHITENING FUSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHITENING FUSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wendi E. Sloane

Wendi E. Sloane Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP200 West Madison Street, Suite 3900Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Oral care products, namely, tooth whitening gels, liquids and creams, tooth whitening maintenance products, namely, tooth whitening gels, liquids and creams, lip-gloss, lipstick, lip balm, toothpastes, breath fresheners, namely, non-medicated diluted breath sprays used as mouthwash, and non-medicated concentrated breath sprays, non-medicated mouthwashes, non-medicated oral breath freshening sprays and breath freshening confectionery, namely, dissolvable breath mints and chewing gumABANDONED—
021Toothbrushes and dental flossABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2007MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 21, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 2, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 7, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 7, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance