USPTO serial 77114642
WRAP 'N ROLL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WRAP 'N ROLL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary M. Lee
Mary M. Lee MARY M. LEE, P.C.1300 E 9TH ST STE 4EDMOND, OK 73034-5760UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | infant blankets; infant blankets with attached head and neck support pillows for supporting a small or premature infant in a car seat | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by C. J. Leachco, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by C. J. Leachco, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by LEACHCO, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named WRAP 'N ROLL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 20, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |