USPTO serial 77114837
FPF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FPF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
JEFFREY A. SMITH MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN, P.C.2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201-3331UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software namely, embedded application and operating system software for use in Internet-enabled devices and in the delivery of interactive content to Internet-enabled devices; computer programs downloadable from a global computer network namely, embedded application and operating system software for use in Internet-enabled devices and in the delivery of interactive content to Internet-enabled devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, computer programming for others in the field of interface design and network software applications; software development services for others; computer services consultation in the fields of computer hardware, software and interface design specification; computer services consultation in the fields of computer hardware, software, interface architecture and design review, integration of software with OEM platforms, operating systems, virtual machines and other third party applications; computer services consultation in the fields of embedded Java porting, integration, tuning and customizing; Internet services, namely, providing information via a global computer network on development, design, architecture and integration of computer software, hardware, interface, network-enabled information products, and operating system software; technical support services and customer support services provided by telephone, e-mail and in person related to troubleshooting and computer software installation and operation, computer software, hardware and interface development, design and integration; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |