USPTO serial 77115014
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aretha Somerville
Michael S. Martin, Jr. Van De Zon, Inc.4118 West Girard AvenuePhiladelphia, PA 19104-1011UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's clothing and accessories | PARTIALLY PAID | Dec 20, 2007 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 22, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2007 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jun 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |