Drawing for BLUEVISTA

USPTO serial 77115521

BLUEVISTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUEVISTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dana E. Miles

DANA E. MILES LAW OFFICES OF DANA E. MILES22431 ANTONIO PKWY STE B160-276RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA, CA 92688-2804UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in an internet-based system for providing reservation, management and reporting services for hotels and vacation rental propertiesACTIVE—
042Application service provider, namely, providing, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, websites, and databases in the field of reservation, management and reporting services for hotels and vacation rental propertiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2009PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Sep 9, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 2, 2009PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2009UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 22, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 11, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 28, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 20, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 1, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Feb 28, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance