Drawing for THE LOCKHORNS

USPTO serial 77116251

THE LOCKHORNS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LOCKHORNS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Motion picture films, animated motion picture films, and video recordings all featuring humor and comedy and prepared for exhibition in theaters, television, cable television, satellite television, computer networks, the internet, and mobile electronic devicesACTIVE—
025Articles of clothing, namely, t-shirts, tank tops, polo shirts, button front shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, pants, dresses, jerseys, jackets, windshirts, shorts, one-piece underwear for infants, underwear, unitards, pajamas, sleepwear, loungewear, robes, ties, socks, hatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 3, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 30, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 30, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 10, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 9, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 13, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 15, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 1, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 1, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 17, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 17, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 26, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 1, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 31, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 1, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance