USPTO serial 77116477
ROCK FABULOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROCK FABULOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Apolzon
LAWRENCE E. APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Fragrances for personal use, including, perfumery, cologne, and toilet water; cosmetics and personal care products, namely, body lotion, hand lotion, toilet soap, hand soap, body soap, face soap, deodorant soap, facial creams, facial lotions, after shave, shaving cream, shaving gel, bath gels, bath oils, and cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Writing instruments, including, pens and pencils; desk supplies, namely, pen and pencil holders; stationery and printed materials, namely, picture books, diaries, blank writing journals, note paper, notebooks, and envelopes; paper bags, stationery-type portfolios; agenda books; address books, and personal organizers; clip boards; calendars; posters | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Handbags, purses, coin purses, clutch bags; backpacks; all purpose sport bags; messenger bags; tote bags; briefcases; toiletry bags sold empty; cosmetic bags sold empty; umbrellas; small leather articles, namely, wallets, key cases, and key chains; leather articles, namely, pocketbooks | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | furniture, home furnishings, and home furnishing accessories, namely, tables, chairs, desks, stools, shelving units and racks, benches, china cabinets, china hutches, buffets, utility cabinets, utility shelves, sofas, love seats, ottomans, sectionals, settees, chaise lounges, pillows, entertainment centers, armoires, chests of drawers, nightstands, end tables, cocktail tables, console tables, dining tables, dining chairs, sideboards, throw pillows, mirrors, and picture frames; non-metal and non-leather key chains and key fobs | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Bed, bath and home furnishings and accessories, namely, towels, bed linen, pillow cases, pillow shams, bedspreads, comforters, dust ruffles, duvet covers, mattress pads, feather beds, blanket throws, bed blankets, bed sheets, bath towel sets comprised of bath towels, hand towels and wash cloths, shower curtains, curtains, table cloths not of paper, table linens, textile napkins, placemats not of paper, cloth coasters, fabric table runners | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Fabric bath mats, bath rugs, door mats, textile floor mats for use in the home | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by That's So Cool, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by That's So Cool, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named ROCK FABULOUS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |