Drawing for YARD HOUSE RESTAURANTS

USPTO serial 77116697

YARD HOUSE RESTAURANTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YARD HOUSE RESTAURANTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William A. Finkelstein

WILLIAM A. FINKELSTEIN Steptoe & Johnson LLP2121 AVENUE OF THE STARS STE 2800Suite 2800LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-5052

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Frozen, prepared and packaged meals consisting primarily of chicken, fish, shellfish, beef, calamari, and turkey; frozen, prepared and packaged snack dips consisting primarily of vegetables, cheese, and shellfishACTIVE—
030Frozen, prepared and packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta that may include one or more of the following, chicken, cheese, fish, and shellfish; frozen, prepared and packaged pizzas; frozen, prepared and packaged enchiladas; frozen, prepared and packaged pot pies; frozen, prepared and packaged egg rolls; frozen, prepared and packaged dessert items, namely, bakery desserts and custardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 27, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 4, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 2, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 2, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 21, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 19, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 19, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 19, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 3, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 3, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 12, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 23, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 23, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 28, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 23, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 10, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 3, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 12, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 5, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 29, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Mar 1, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance