USPTO serial 77116819
GOLDEN-I
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3828649Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 3, 2010
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GOLDEN-I?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. DuPre'
JOHN L. DUPRE' HAMILTON, BROOK, SMITH & REYNOLDS, P.C.530 VIRGINIA ROADP.O. BOX 9133CONCORD, MA 01742-9133Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Near-eye monocular video display systems, comprised primarily of microdisplays, namely, liquid crystal displays, imaging optics and display control circuits; Near-eye video display systems, composed primarily of microdisplays, namely, liquid crystal displays, imaging optics and display control circuits, that are wireless and can be attached to or worn about the human head; Near-eye video display systems, composed primarily of microdisplays, namely, liquid crystal displays, imaging optics and display control circuits, that are wireless and can be attached to a hat or garment worn on or about the neck or head; Near-eye video display systems, composed primarily of microdisplays, namely, liquid crystal displays, imaging optics and display control circuits, that are wireless and can be attached to eyeglass frames, goggles or protective eyewear; Near-eye video display systems, composed primarily of microdisplays, namely, liquid crystal displays, imaging optics and display control circuits, that can be used with Wireless USB, Local Area Network or Cellular wireless Transmit and/or Receive interfaces; Near-eye video display systems, composed primarily of microdisplays, namely, liquid crystal displays, imaging optics and display control circuits, that can be used with a broadcast television, broadcast radio, closed circuit television or radio receiver interface; Near-eye monocular video display systems, comprised primarily of microdisplays, namely, liquid crystal displays, imaging optics and display control circuits, that can be used with mono or stereo ear phones, headphones and/or speakers; Near-eye monocular video display systems, composed primarily of microdisplays, namely, liquid crystal displays, imaging optics and display control circuits, that are sold with or without ambient noise cancellation; Near-eye monocular video display systems composed primarily of microdisplays, namely, liquid crystal displays, imaging optics and display control circuits, having user speech recognition, user voice control and/or a wireless slaved tactile hand operated control device incorporating one or more features such as a mouse, tract ball, wheel, and/or button control functionality; Near-eye video display systems, composed primarily of microdisplays, namely, liquid crystal displays, imaging optics and display control circuits, that use a graphical user interface to slave and/or control, wirelessly, other electronic products such as, cellular phones, personal digital assistants, personal digital assistants with integrated cellular phone functionality, notebook computers, desk-top computers, computer servers, computer network routers, local area networks and/or remote networks connected to a wireless access point, wireless communication systems, household and industrial appliances, security systems, environmental systems, automotive, vehicular and airplane communication, global positioning or direction systems, and public transportation services; Near-eye video display systems composed primarily of microdisplays, namely, liquid crystal displays, imaging optics and display control circuits, that are wireless and used to control and slave industrial tools | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 3, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |