USPTO serial 77117266
WIRE FENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4002622Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2011
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WIRE FENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dripping Springs, TX
Dripping Springs, TX
Dripping Springs, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Strand
Peter J. Strand Leavens, Strand & Glover, LLC203 N. LaSalle StreetSuite 2550Chicago, IL 60601Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Neumann, Kurt Robert
- Other trademarks owned by Neumann, Kurt Robert
- Other trademarks owned by Neumann, Kurt Robert
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WIRE FENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |