USPTO serial 77117473
SOCAL DRUMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOCAL DRUMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Lake Village, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christina Perez
Mary Vidal Hays Aronberg Goldgehn Davis & Garmisa330 N. Wabash, Ste. 1700Chicago, IL 60611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Carrying bags, carrying cases and covers for deejay audio-visual and special effects equipment; sound reinforcement and recording equipment, namely, audio tape recorders, amplifiers, public address systems, digital sound boards for amplifiers, rack equipment, namely, racks for loudspeakers and amplifiers, audio extension cords for use with sound amplifiers, electronic effects pedals for use with sound amplifiers, signal processors, stands for microphones, microphones; carrying cases for portable digital media players; drum hardware and accessories, namely, drum amplifiers | ACTIVE | — |
| 015 | Percussion instruments and parts and accessories therefor, namely, electronic drums, acoustic drums and structural parts therefor, cymbals, cymbal stands, drum stands, snare wires for use with snare drums, drum sticks and sound effect pedals for drums, drum hardware and accessories, namely, drum amplifiers; Carrying bags, carrying cases and covers for racks and stands for musical instruments; musical instruments, namely, acoustic and electric guitars, brass and woodwind instruments and all percussion instruments, namely, drum kits consisting of drums and drumsticks, and hand and ethnic percussion instruments; backpacks specially designed for musical instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Men's and women's active apparel, namely, t-shirts, tank tops, sweatshirts, sweat suits, sweaters, fleece tops, jackets, coats, polo shirts, baseball jerseys, shorts, hats, suspenders, athletic footwear, bandanas, bathing suits, bathing trunks, bathrobes, beachwear, belts, buckles, berets, blazers, blouses, capes, capris, cardigans, casual socks, boots, bow ties, boxer shorts, bras, briefs, body suits, bomber jackets, camisoles, chemises, chino pants, coveralls, cummerbunds, down-filled jackets, dresses, ear muffs, flannel shirts, gloves, golf shirts, gowns, gym shorts, halter tops, headbands, infant wear, jeans, leggings, leotards, lingerie, mittens, moccasins, night shirts, rainwear, rugby shirts, ski wear, sleepwear, undergarments, wristbands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |