USPTO serial 77117494
RAVEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAVEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Lake Village, CA
West Lake Village, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christina Perez
CHRISTINA PEREZ ARONBERG GOLDGEHN DAVIS & GARMISA330 N WABASH AVE STE 3000CHICAGO, IL 60611-3779UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | Percussion instruments and parts and accessories therefor, namely, electronic drums, acoustic drums and structural parts therefor, cymbals, cymbal stands, drum stands, snare wires for use with snare drums, drum sticks and sound effect pedals for drums; carrying bags, carrying cases and covers for racks and stands for musical instruments; musical instruments namely, acoustic and electric guitars, brass and woodwind instruments and all percussion instruments, namely, drum kits consisting of drums and drumsticks, and hand and ethnic percussion instruments; backpacks specially designed for musical instruments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 20, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |