USPTO serial 77117590
BRONCHNAV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRONCHNAV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank J. Keegan
FRANK J. KEEGAN PHILIPS IP&SP.O. BOX 3001BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY 10510-8001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for use in image guided surgery; computer software for integrating views of a patient with the tracked position of tools or instruments for use in computer assisted surgery; computer software for integrating representations of application tools and instruments with images of patients obtained by imaging modalities including Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonant Imaging (MR), Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET); computer hardware for medical use; computer hardware; surgery planning software; surgery planning software for use in image guided surgery; tool identification software used for use in image guided surgery; navigation software for image guided surgery; computer workstations comprising computer hardware and software for image guided surgery, spatial position sensors, tool interface units for tracking tools, universal handles, monitors and cart, and, application tools and instruments and component parts therefor for tracking surgical instrument location used for image guided surgery; tool offset calibrators; magnetic tool offset calibrators; distortion measurement devices for measuring distortions in a generated electromagnetic field; footswitches, namely, a computer input device triggered by a foot; computer input devices; optical tool offset calibrators | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical devices, namely, registration and automatic registration devices for image guided surgery; tracking devices for medical devices to track the position and/or orientation of medical devices during image guided surgery; telemetry devices for medical applications; endoscopes; flexible endoscopes; bronchoscopes; tracked endoscopes; tracked flexible endoscopes; tracked bronchoscopes; catheters; tracked catheters; surgical instruments and apparatus, namely, needles, tracked needles, stylettes, tracked stylettes, bone screws, tracked bone screws, stylette pairs, cannula pairs, tracked cannula pairs, needle device introducers, tracked vertebroplasty needles, tracked needle device introducers, needle introducers, tracked needle introducers, biopsy needle guns, tracked biopsy needle guns, tracked k-wires, k-wires, bone wires, tracked bone screws, tracked multisensor guidewires, guidewires, tracked single sensor guidewires, vertebroplasty needles, aspiration needles, tracked aspiration needles, trackers for use in image guided surgery, cannulas, tracked cannulas; medical ultrasound equipment, namely, laparoscope ultrasound trackers, tracked laparoscope ultrasound, tracked ultrasound transducers, positioning aids for use in ultrasound imagery, transcutaneous ultrasound trackers, endorectal ultrasound trackers, ultrasound tracker calibrators; fluoroscope tracker and local calibrator therefor; tracked fluoroscope; fluoroscope tracker and integrated calibrator therefor; medical instrument adaptors; medical probes, namely, disposable button probes, tracked disposable button probes, reusable probes, tracked reusable probes; image guided surgery equipment, namely, universal adaptor for medical devices, disposable dynamic reference patches, skin patches for referencing, locatable guides, tracked locatable guides, reusable dynamic reference frames, tracked positioning aids, tracked steerable locatable guides, tracked clamps, tracked cutting devices, tracked shunts and introducers, tracked grasper, tracked brush, precision spatial measurement devices, tracked medical instrument adaptors; steerable locatable guides; steerable catheters; tracked steerable catheters; brush; clamps; cutters; scalpels; tracked scalpels; stents; tracked stents; positioning aids; shunts and introducers; grasper; image guided surgery systems, sold as a unit, namely hardware and software and application tools and instruments and component parts therefor for tracking surgical instrument location; computer assisted surgery systems, sold as a unit, consisting primarily of computer hardware and software for image guided surgery, spatial position sensors, tool interface units for tracking tools, universal handles, monitors and cart; computer assisted image guided surgery systems, comprised of computer hardware and software for image guided surgery, spatial position sensors, tool interface units for tracking tools, universal handles, monitors and cart, and, application tools and instruments and component parts therefor for tracking surgical instrument location for medical use; computer assisted image guided surgery apparatus for using pre-operative and intra-operative images; computer assisted guided surgery system consisting of computer hardware and software for image guided surgery, spatial position sensors, tool interface units for tracking tools, universal handles, monitors and cart, and application tools and instruments and component parts therefor for tracking surgical instrument location, sold as a unit, for providing 3-dimensional visualization and navigation of instruments; surgical apparatus sold as a unit, namely, computer assisted surgery system consisting of computer hardware and software for image guided surgery, spatial position sensors, tool interface units for tracking tools, universal handles, monitors and cart, and, application tools and instruments and component parts therefor for tracking surgical instrument location, sold as a unit, for providing 3-dimensional visualization and navigation instruments; surgical apparatus sold as a unit, namely, image guided surgery system consisting of computer hardware and software for image guided surgery, spatial position sensors, tool interface units for tracking tools, universal handles, monitors and cart, and, application tools and instruments and component parts therefor for tracking surgical instrument location; surgical apparatus sold as a unit, namely, mobile system cart for use in image guided surgery, all being computer systems for medical use; surgical apparatus sold as a unit, namely, mobile system cart having electro-magnetic field generator, computer workstation and instrument connection unit, all being computer systems for medical use; surgical apparatus sold as a unit, namely, image guided surgery cart having electromagnetic field generator, computer work station and connections for medical instruments and devices; surgical apparatus, namely, image guided surgical workstation; metrological instruments and equipment for image guided surgery to measure spatial location, orientation, temperature, impedance and photospectrometry of surgical instruments or patient tissue | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services, mail order services, on-line retail store services featuring precision spatial measurement devices, metrological instruments, metrological equipment, metrological devices, image guided surgery systems, computer assisted surgery systems, computer software and hardware for image guided surgery systems, computer hardware and software for computer assisted surgery systems, medical instruments and apparatuses, and medical devices; manufacturers' representatives in the field of precision spatial measurement devices, metrological instruments, metrological equipment, metrological devices, image guided surgery systems, computer assisted surgery systems, computer software and hardware for image guided surgery systems, computer hardware and software for computer assisted surgery systems, medical instruments and apparatuses, and medical devices; distributorship services in the field of precision spatial measurement devices, metrological instruments, metrological equipment, metrological devices, image guided surgery systems, computer assisted surgery systems, computer software and hardware for image guided surgery systems, computer hardware and software for computer assisted surgery systems, medical instruments and apparatuses, and medical devices; computerized online ordering services in the field of precision spatial measurement devices, metrological instruments, metrological equipment, metrological devices, image guided surgery systems, computer assisted surgery systems, computer software and hardware for image guided surgery systems, computer hardware and software for computer assisted surgery systems, medical instruments and apparatuses, and medical devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Servicing of computer assisted surgery systems and tools; servicing of image guided surgery systems and tools; maintenance of computer assisted surgery systems and tools; maintenance of image guided surgery systems and tools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |