Drawing for RELOGIC

USPTO serial 77118733

RELOGIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RELOGIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James W. Owens, Jr., Esq.

Valissa Tsoucaris Hamil/Hecht LLC140 East 19th AvenueSuite 600Denver, CO 80203-1035

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Real estate consulting and brokerage servicesABANDONEDNov 2, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 20, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 20, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 20, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 13, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 22, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 20, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 8, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 26, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance