Drawing for NANO-ENGINEERED

USPTO serial 77118783

NANO-ENGINEERED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HACK, ANDREA R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANO-ENGINEERED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard J. Shire

HOWARD J. SHIRE KENYON & KENYON LLP1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary supplements; food supplements, nutritional supplements, vitamin supplements; ingredient blend sold as a component of dietary supplements, food supplements, nutritional supplements and vitamin supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 8, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 8, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 21, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 2, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 17, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 17, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 18, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 18, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2007AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
May 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance