USPTO serial 77118859
OPTIONS BY ORGANICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTIONS BY ORGANICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian M. Dingman
BRIAN M. DINGMAN MIRICK, O'CONNELL ET AL1700 W PARK DRWESTBOROUGH, MA 01581-3939UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Organic fertilizers for horticultural and domestic use; organic soil amendments for horticultural and domestic use; natural fertilizers for horticultural and domestic use; organic inputs for horticultural and domestic use, namely, processed poultry manure, animal by-products, namely, feathermeal, bonemeal, poultrymeal and bloodmeal; organic minerals, namely, sulphate of potash, rock phosphate with humate, and rock phosphate | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Blackstone Business Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Blackstone Business Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named OPTIONS BY ORGANICS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |