USPTO serial 77118950
YEBOTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YEBOTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Koval, Jr.
6140 PARKLAND BLVD STE 333CLEVELAND, OH 44124-6142UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Communication by electronic computer terminals; Communication by mobile telephone; Communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; Communication via analogue and digital computer terminals; Communication via computer terminals, by digital transmission or by satellite; Communication via fibre optical networks; Communication via fibre-optic networks; Communication via optical fibre networks; Communication via radio, telegraph, telephone and television transmissions; Communications by computer terminals; Communications by means of mobile phones; Communications by mobile phones; Communications by television for meeting; Communications services, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; Communications via analogue and digital computer terminals; Communications via fiber-optic networks; Communications via fibre-optic networks; Communications via multinational telecommunication networks; Data communication by electronic mail; Information transmission via electronic communications networks; Long distance telephone communication services; Mobile telephone communication; Providing co-location services for voice, video and data communications applications; Providing on-line communications links which transfer the website user to other local and global web pages; Providing private and secure real time electronic communication over a computer network; Providing voice communication services via the Internet; Radio, telephone, telegraph communication services; Telecommunications services, namely, personal communication services; Telephone communication services; Transmission of information by data communications for assisting decision making; Transmission of information by electronic communications networks; Transmission of information through video communication systems; Wireless broadband communication services; Wireless communications services, namely, transmission of graphics to mobile telephones | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |