USPTO serial 77119123
THE DRIFTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIFTU, BENIAM
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE DRIFTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CINDY D SALVO
CINDY D SALVO THE SALVO LAW FIRM PC185 FAIRFIELD AVENUESUITE 3C 3DWEST CALDWELL, NJ 07006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Pre-recorded records, audiotapes and compact discs featuring music | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1953 |
| 041 | (Based on Intent to Use) Entertainment services, namely, live performances by a musical band; Presentation of musical performances in the nature of production, planning and arrangement; Music publishing services; Music production services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |