USPTO serial 77119293
HALALFATS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3474198Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 22, 2008
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HALALFATS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD L MORRIS JR
Richard L. Morris Jr. Esq. TrademarkRenewals.comP.O. BOX 398538c/o 1-800-4-TRADEMARKMIAMI BEACH, FL 33239Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food products which are permissible according to Islamic law, namely, Cooking oil, Corn oil, Edible oil, Margarine, Margarine substitutes, Oil, namely, vegetable ghee, Olive oil, Salad oil, Shortening, Soybean oil, Soybean oil for cooking, Vegetable oils | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 26, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 10, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |