USPTO serial 77119434
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
NEWBURGH, NY
Newburgh, NY
Newburgh, NY
Newburgh, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perry Gattegno
Perry Gattegno Litwin Kach LLP200 N LaSalle, Suite 1550Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Supplies for carpet extraction devices, namely, carpet cleaners, Carpet cleaners with deodorizer, Carpet cleaning preparations, carpet shampoo | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1968 |
| 007 | Carpet extraction devices, namely, vacuum cleaners, carpet cleaning machines, and carpet cleaning machines and carpet extractors, and structural parts therefor; upright vacuum cleaners; floor buffers; floor grinding machines; multi-purpose high pressure washers; floor sweeping devices, namely, road sweepers, street sweepers and electric carpet sweepers; floor drying machines, carpet drying machines; floor edge grinding machines; floor polishing machines; power-operated abrasive tools for surface cutting, grinding and polishing concrete, quarry, tile, terrazzo or marble and hard surface floors all for use with machines, namely, polishing brushes, grit brushes for general scrubbing or stripping finishes, fiber scrubbing brush, carbide scarifier for the removal of coatings and adhesives on concrete, scraper for the removal of mastics and paint on concrete, wire brushes; deck brushes, sand paper, diamond, and profiling disks for use with power-operated polishers; diamond smoothing, grinding and polishing wheels for use with power-operated polishers; dust filtration devices, namely, air filters for mechanical purposes, filters for floorcare and vacuum cleaner machines | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1968 |
| 008 | Hand tools, namely, scrapers for the removal of mastics and paint on concrete, sand paper, diamond, and profiling disks for use with manually-operated polishers; diamond smoothing, grinding and polishing wheels for use with manually-operated polishers | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1968 |
| 011 | Water filtration devices, namely, water treatment equipment, namely, cartridge filtration units and reverse osmosis filtration units, and filters made of fiber for water filtration; air filters for domestic use and for commercial installations and industrial air filter machines | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2006 |
| 021 | Floor brushes; floor brushes, namely, polishing brushes, grit brushes for general scrubbing or stripping finishes, fiber scrubbing brushes, wire brushes, and deck brushes; carpet sweepers | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1968 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 6, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 19, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |