USPTO serial 77120069
NUCREDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUCREDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clifford W. Browning
Clifford W. Browning Krieg DeVault LLPOne Indiana Square, Suite 2800Indianapolis, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for corporate and business solutions for use in business management, finance, purchasing, marketing, sales, human resources, and information technology infrastructure for use in business process automation, sales force automation, customer relationship management, accounting, payroll, bill paying, employee time management, billing and expense reporting, financial management, collaboration platforms, business management, business to business transactions, workflow management, business document management, enterprise resource planning, customer support, office and business productivity, electronic commerce transactions, and electronic business transactions | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training in the field of computer software; arranging and conducting training workshops in the field of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring software in the field of corporate and business solutions for use in business management, finance, purchasing, marketing, sales, human resources, and information technology infrastructure for use in business process automation, sales force automation, customer relationship management, accounting, payroll, bill paying, employee time management, billing and expense reporting, financial management, collaboration platforms, business management, business to business transactions, workflow management, business document management, enterprise resource planning, customer support, office and business productivity, electronic commerce transactions, and electronic business transactions; application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications for others; computer network design and computer software design for the corporate and business environment; computer network design for others; rental of application software; repair of computer software; research, development and consultation related thereto in the field of computer software development and solutions; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer software for others; development, design, installation, maintenance and updating of computer software; website hosting services for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NuCredo LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NuCredo LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NUCREDO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |