CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for HAIRŸKIDS Y BECAUSE IT'S ALL NATURAL

USPTO serial 77120135

HAIRŸKIDS Y BECAUSE IT'S ALL NATURAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAIRŸKIDS Y BECAUSE IT'S ALL NATURAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A. Steiner, Esq.

Mark A. Steiner, Esq. Duane Morris LLPSpear Tower, One Market Plaza, Ste. 2200San Francisco, CA 94105-1127UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair and body care products, namely, shampoo, conditioner, styling gel, styling spritz, hairspray, bubble bathACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 7, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 8, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 13, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 8, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 8, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 5, 2010DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Feb 16, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 12, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 9, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 5, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 26, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 25, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 25, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 28, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 25, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 28, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 13, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 15, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 15, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2007MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Mar 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance