Drawing for ASTICA

USPTO serial 77120220

ASTICA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, JANET H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASTICA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third Avenue10th FloorNew York, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 31, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 29, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 13, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 18, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 30, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 30, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 30, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 4, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 2, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 18, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance