CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for VITAL LIFESTYLE

USPTO serial 77120528

VITAL LIFESTYLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VITAL LIFESTYLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas W. Brooke

THOMAS W. BROOKE HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Protein based, nutrient-dense snack barsACTIVE—
030Cookies, crackers, breakfast cereals, cereal-based snack bars and pretzelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 11, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 10, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 9, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 1, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 1, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 27, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 27, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 4, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 3, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 13, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Mar 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance