USPTO serial 77120674
DISCOVERY QUEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DISCOVERY QUEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SILVER SPRING, MD
SILVER SPRING, MD
Discovery Communications, Inc.
Silver Spring, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony V. Lupo
Anthony V. Lupo and Sarah E. Bruno ARENT FOX LLP1717 K Street, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5342UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded video disks, audio-visual recordings, videotapes, compact disks, DVDs and CD-ROMs, all on the subjects of history, geography, exploration, architecture, science, technology, politics, nature, natural history, culture and the arts | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of audio-visual programs and content, namely, continuing shows on the subjects of history, geography, exploration, architecture, science, technology, politics, nature, natural history, culture and the arts, distributed through audio and video media, namely, television, satellite, wireless, fiber optics, cable, radio and a global computer network; entertainment information regarding audio-visual shows on the subjects of history, geography, exploration, architecture, science, technology, politics, nature, natural history, culture and the arts provided via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Discovery Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named DISCOVERY QUEST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 7, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |