Drawing for REMODEL THIS!

USPTO serial 77120960

REMODEL THIS!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REMODEL THIS!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

LAWRENCE E. APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed materials, namely, books, newsletters, pamphlets in the field of home renovation; calendars; planning books for use in tracking expenses, contractors, subcontractors, materials, and sources in connection with home renovations; desk supplies, namely, pens, pencils, notepads, pencil holders, notepad holders; personal organizersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 12, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 3, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 23, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 22, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 10, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 10, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 11, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 9, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 16, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 31, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance