Drawing for MECHWARRIOR

USPTO serial 77121246

MECHWARRIOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MECHWARRIOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine E. Maxson

Catherine E. Maxson Davis Wright Tremaine LLP1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200Seattle, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of motion pictures and television programs; production of audio visual programs and interactive audio visual programs in the fields of cartoons and fiction; providing audio visual programs and interactive audio visual programs in the fields of cartoons and fiction via wireless devices and the Internet; animation production services; electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text, graphics, and audio works of others on the Internet and on CD and DVD featuring fiction and cartoons; written text editing; entertainment in the nature of role playing game tournaments and fictional combat game tournaments, excluding online role playing game tournaments and online fictional combat game tournaments; a live-action, comedy, drama and/or animated motion picture theatrical films featuring fictional heroic and villainous charactersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 18, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 17, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 15, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 18, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 17, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 13, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 23, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 19, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 21, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 20, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 20, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
May 19, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 29, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 25, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 3, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 6, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 31, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance