USPTO serial 77121492
ROCKABILLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROCKABILLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Mizrahi, Esq.
Mark B. Mizrahi BROOKS KUSHMAN PC1000 Town Center22nd FloorSouthfield, MI 48075Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS AND BEAUTY AIDS, NAMELY, SKIN LOTIONS, FACE CREAMS, EYE CREAMS, CREAM PACKS, TOILET WATER, PERFUME, HAND LOTION, ANTI-AGING CREAMS, BODY POWDERS, DEODORANTS FOR PERSONAL USE, SKIN AND BODY SOAPS, AND BATH GELS, SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, MOISTURIZERS, LOTIONS AND CREMES FOR THE FACE AND BODY, COLOGNE, SCENTED LOTIONS FOR THE BODY, AFTERSHAVE, NAMELY, LOTION AND BALMS, BATH CRYSTALS, NON-MEDICATED TOILETRIES, SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, PERFUMES, SOAPS; COSMETICS, NAMELY, FOUNDATION MAKEUP, MASCARA, EYE SHADOW, EYE LINER, EYE DEFINER, LIPSTICK, LIP LINER, LIP TINTS, EYEBROW PENCILS, FACE POWDER, BRONZER, BLUSHER, MOISTURIZER, COLOR BALANCE BASE FLUID AND CONCEALER; NON-MEDICATED TOILET WATER; ABRASIVES FOR PERSONAL USE, NAMELY, FACIAL SCRUB, FACIAL CLEANSERS, TOILET SOAP, SKIN MOISTURIZING CREAM, HAND MOISTURIZING LOTION AND MOISTURIZING BODY LOTION; PERSONAL DEODORANTS, DEPILATORIES, ANTIPERSPIRANT PREPARATIONS, NON-MEDICATED TALCUM POWDER FOR TOILET PURPOSES; COSMETICS, NAMELY, SUN TANNING PREPARATIONS, NON-MEDICATED MASSAGE OILS AND LOTIONS; BATH ADDITIVES, NAMELY, BATH OILS, BATH BEADS, MILK BATH, BODY SHAMPOOS, SHOWER GELS, BATH SALTS AND BUBBLE BATH, ALL NOT FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; SHAVING CREAM, SHAVING LOTION, SHAVING BALM, SHAVING GEL, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE, CLEANSING AND MOISTURIZING FACIAL PACKS, NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS, NAIL POLISH, PUMICE STONE FOR PERSONAL USE, COTTON STICKS AND WOOL SWABS FOR NON-MEDICAL PURPOSES ALL FOR USE ON THE BODY; SCENTED ROOM FRAGRANCES, POTPOURRI, POWDERED COSMETIC TISSUES, BODY SCRUBS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | SUNGLASSES, EYEWEAR, OPTICAL AND SPECTACLE FRAMES, SPORTS AND SKI GOGGLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | HANDBAGS; KNAPSACKS; TRAVEL BAGS; VANITY CASES SOLD EMPTY; PURSES; BILLFOLDS; WALLETS; BRIEFCASES; KEY-CASES; LEATHER KEY CHAINS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, SWEATERS, TROUSERS, CARDIGANS, BLOUSES, TRACKSUITS, UNDERWEAR, COATS, BATHING SUITS, PAJAMAS, STOCKINGS, SOCKS, BRAS, SLIPS, PANTIES, BOXER SHORTS, ROBES, GLOVES, SCARVES, INTIMATE APPAREL, NAMELY, LINGERIE, TIGHTS, LEGGINGS, AND KNITWEAR, NAMELY, KNIT SHIRTS, KNIT SWEATERS, KNIT SHORTS, KNITTED CAPS, AND KNITTED UNDERWEAR; FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, SHOES, BOOTS, AND SLIPPERS; BELTS; HEAD WEAR; HATS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rockabilly Clothing
- Other trademarks owned by Rockabilly Clothing
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ROCKABILLY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 20, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |