USPTO serial 77121819
AERIAL BURIAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWER, MARGARET
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AERIAL BURIAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY D. COHEN
JEFFREY D. COHEN Jeffrey D. Cohen, Attorney at LawP O Box 12865la Jolla, CA 92039-2865UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Dispersal of cremated human and pet remains by aircraft | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 25, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |