Drawing for LAUNDRY BY DESIGN

USPTO serial 77122243

LAUNDRY BY DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOVELACE, JAMES B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAUNDRY BY DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tricia McDermott Thompkins

Tricia McDermott Thompkins PEI Licensing, Inc.3000 NW 107th AvenueLegal Dept.Miami, FL 33172

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035On-line retail store services featuring apparel, leather goods, fashion accessories, jewelry, footwear, cosmetics, personal care products, eyewear, luggage and home products; Retail store services featuring apparel, leather goods, fashion accessories, jewelry, footwear, cosmetics, personal care products, eyewear, luggage and home products; Mail order services featuring apparel, leather goods, fashion accessories, jewelry, footwear, cosmetics, personal care products, eyewear, luggage and home productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 22, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 14, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 15, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 15, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 22, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 23, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 15, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 16, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 16, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 21, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 19, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 17, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 15, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 14, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 13, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 13, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 13, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 13, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 13, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 13, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 10, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 10, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 10, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 10, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance