Drawing for E-SPEED BY NEW VISIONS

USPTO serial 77123356

E-SPEED BY NEW VISIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E-SPEED BY NEW VISIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard R. Michaud

RICHARD R. MICHAUD MICHAUD-DUFFY GROUP LLP306 INDUSTRIAL PARK RD STE 206MIDDLETOWN, CT 06457-7556UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038High-speed broadband services over the electric utility grid (medium and low voltage) to create a high-speed broadband network; High-speed transmissions of voice, data and video over the electric lines and over the electric wiring within a home or businessACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 18, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 18, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 3, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 7, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 7, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 17, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 17, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 17, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 17, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 9, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance