USPTO serial 77123673
BASIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAI, TINA HSIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BASIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan L. Long
JOAN L. LONG MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLPPO BOX 2828CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education and instruction, namely, educational services in the nature of classes and seminars in the fields of business, telecommunications and computers, and the distribution of course materials therewith; entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances, namely, musical bands, gymnastic, dance, and ballet performances; entertainment services, namely, providing musical, variety, news and comedy shows via a global computer information network; providing entertainment information at the specific request of end-users by means of telephone or global communications networks; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games for children and adults; organizing community sporting and cultural events; publication of books, magazines, journals, manuals, brochures and leaflets on the subject of telecommunications; electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others on telecommunications recorded on electronic media, namely, CD, DVD and online; organizing fairs and exhibitions in the field of visual and audio performances, namely, rock group, gymnastic, dance, and ballet performances | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |