USPTO serial 77124419
NEO DERMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEO DERMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CMI Cosmetic Manufacturers Inc. operating as Canadian Faces
Concord, CA
Other trademarks owned by CMI Cosmetic Manufacturers Inc. operating as Canadian Faces
CMI Cosmetic Manufacturers Inc. operating as Canadian Faces
Concord, CA
Other trademarks owned by CMI Cosmetic Manufacturers Inc. operating as Canadian Faces
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fay O'Brien
Fay O'Brien 688 TWEEDSMUIR AVENUEOTTAWA; ONTARIOK1Z5P6CANADA, K1Z5P6Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic pencils, cosmetic pads, mascara, eye makeup, eye makeup remover, eye pencils, eye creams, eye gels, eyeliners, gel eye masks, eyeshadow, eyebrow pencils, eyebrow brushes, eyelash thickeners in the nature of mascaras, facial makeup, foundation makeup, blush, blush creams, pressed face powders, skin clarifiers, skin cleansers, skin conditioners, skin creams, skin emollients, skin lighteners, skin lotions, skin masks, skin moisturizers, skin soaps, skin texturizers, skin toners, skin exfoliation gels, beauty masks, personal deodorants, hand creams, hand lotions, body creams, body moisturizers, body mask creams, body mask powders, non-medicated skin moisturizing balms, body oils, body powders, body lotions, body scrubs, body bath gels, skin care preparation, namely, fruit acid peels for skin, shower oils, shower gels, bath oils, bath gels, massage oils, massage gels, massage creams, hair bleaching preparations, hair coloring preparations, hair conditioners, hair gels, hair lighteners, hair lotions, hair mousses, hair pomades, hair rinses, hair shampoos, hair sprays, hair straightening preparations, hair tinting brighteners in the nature of hair color, hair waving lotions, , hair detangling lotions, hair styling preparation, namely, hair finishing hold gels, hair cosmetics, namely, hair growth stimulants and hair growth retardant creams and serums, after-shave balms, after-shave creams, after-shave lotions, lipsticks, lip pencils, lip gloss, lip tinting gels, lip moisturizers, lip lipstick sealers, lip exfoliation scrubs, nail polishes, nail polish removers, nail growth enhancers, namely nail stregtheners, nail ridge fillers, nail polish top coats, nail polish base coats, cuticle creams, cuticle removing preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CMI Cosmetic Manufacturers Inc. operating as Canadian Faces
- Other trademarks owned by CMI Cosmetic Manufacturers Inc. operating as Canadian Faces
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named NEO DERMA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 30, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |